Stated most succinctly, it runs: The world exhibits teleological order design, adaptation. Therefore, it was produced by an intelligent designer.
What is the Cosmological argument for the existence of God? It begins with what is most obvious in reality: These types of arguments go all the way back to Plato and have been used by notable philosophers and theologians ever since.
Science finally caught up with theologians in the 20th century, when it was confirmed that the universe must have had a beginning. So, today, the cosmological arguments are even powerful for non-philosophers.
There are two basic forms of these arguments, and the easiest way to think of them might be the "vertical" and the "horizontal. In the vertical form, it is argued that every created thing is being caused right now imagine a timeline with an arrow pointing up from the universe to God.
The horizontal version shows that creation had to have a cause in the beginning imagine that same timeline only with an arrow pointing backward to a beginning point in time.
The horizontal is a little easier to understand because it does not require much philosophizing. The basic argument is that all things that have beginnings had to have causes.
The universe had a beginning; therefore, the universe had a cause.
That cause, being outside the whole universe, is God. Someone might say that some things are caused by other things, but this does not solve the problem.
This is because those other things had to have causes, too, and this cannot go on forever. Let's take a simple example: All trees began to exist at some point for they have not always existed.
Each tree had its beginning in a seed the "cause" of the tree. But every seed had its beginning "cause" in another tree. There cannot be an infinite series of tree-seed-tree-seed, because no series is infinite—it cannot go on forever.
All series are finite limited by definition. There is no such thing as an infinite number, because even the number series is limited although you can always add one more, you are always at a finite number.
If there is an end, it is not infinite. All series have two endings, actually—at the end and at the beginning try to imagine a one-ended stick! But if there were no first causethe chain of causes never would have started.
Therefore, there is, at the beginning at least, a first cause—one that had no beginning. This first cause is God. The vertical form is a bit more difficult to understand, but it is more powerful because not only does it show that God had to cause the "chain of causes" in the beginning, He must still be causing things to exist right now.
Again, we begin by noting that things exist. Next, while we often tend to think of existence as a property that things sort of "own"—that once something is created, existence is just part of what it is—this is not the case.Cosmological and teleological arguments are theological attempts to prove the existence of a god using the tools of logic in the absence of observable evidence.
The Big Bang Theory and Theory of Evolution are scientific models which use observable evidence to explain the current state of the.
The Arguments that Prove God Exists. Evidence for the existence of the Theistic God is found in three main arguments used by theists today. These arguments are: but are not absolutely necessary.
Each one of the three main arguments (cosmological, teleological, moral law) by itself does not prove the ‘Theistic’ God, but something less. The teleological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of God that begins with the observation of the purposiveness of nature.
The teleological argument moves to the conclusion that there must exist . Cosmological, Ontological and Teleological Arguments Evidences in Proving Existence of the Supreme Personal Being.
Ontological And Cosmological Arguments The Existence Of God Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Published: Similar to the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, also known as the first cause argument, is a classical argument for the existence of God.
The first three ways forms the cosmological argument as a proof of the. These arguments are either a priori, understood independent of worldly experience and observation (Ontological Argument), or a posteriori, dependent on experience and based on observations of how the world is (Cosmological and Teleological Arguments).